Advancing the Science of Science Funding Conference at the NBER Summer Institute
Advancing the Science of Science Funding Conference at the NBER Summer Institute
Supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Cambridge, MA July 18-19, 2019
Royal Sonesta Hotel
Skyline Rooms A and B
Program
Day 1: Thursday July 18th
8:00 am Coffee and Pastries
8:45-9:00: INTRODUCTION AND WELCOME: Reinhilde and Paula
9:00-12:00 SESSION I: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF SCIENCE FUNDING
Chair: Adam Jaffe (TBC)
- Relationship of funding to Patents:
- Relationship of funding to Publishing:
- Impact on Policy Making
Danil Mikhailov & Chonnettia Jones*, (Wellcome Trust, Data science methods to assess the influence of scientific research on policy
J. Hjort* (Columbia University), D; Moreira, G.Rao, J.F. Santini, How Research Affects Policy: Experimental Evidence from 2,150 Brazilian Municipalities
Discussants: Kei Koizuma (AAAS) and Daniel Goroff (Alfred P. Sloan Foundation)
General discussion
Lee Fleming* (Stanford University), H. Greene, G. Li, M. Marx, D. Yao U.S. innovation relies increasingly upon
 Federal research
Discussant: Neil Thompson
R. Sattari & Bruce Weinberg* (Ohio State University): The Marginal Scientific Product of Investments in Science
Discussant: Pierre Azoulay
10:45-11:00: COFFEE BREAK
12:15 TO 1:00: LUNCH
1:00- 2:30: SESSION II: RISK TAKING IN SCIENCE FUNDING
Chair: Chiara Franzoni
- Introduction by the Chair: Chiara Franzoni—insights from literature and from small scale survey
- Examples of Funders approaches for increasing risk taking:
- Assessing risk in selection bias and treatment effect
- Open discussion
• NIH Directors Award for high risk high reward; Nicole Garbarini (NIH)
• Pew Foundation, Kara Coleman (Pew Charitable Trust)
• Scialog, Dr. Richard Wiener (Research Corporation)
• ERC, Theodore Papazoglou
Veugelers (KU Leuven), Stephan & Wang: Do funding agencies select and enable risky research: Evidence from ERC using novelty as a proxy of risk taking
Discussant: Karim Lakhani (Harvard)
2:45-4:15 : SESSION III LINKING SCIENCE/PUBLICATIONS TO TECHNOLOGY/PATENTS
Chair: Ben Jones
Data-methodology session: what is currently the state of the art on how to link science and technology? Best practices? Pitfalls? How to move forward?
-
• Introduction/overview by the Chair:
- Poege, F, Dietmar Harhoff* (LMU), F. Gaessler & S. Baruffaldi : Science Quality and the Value of Inventions
- Watzinger, M. & M. Schnitzer* (LMU): Standing on the shoulders of science
- Discussants: Bhaven Sampat (Columbia); Andy Toole (USPTO Chief Economist)
- Watzinger, M. & M. Schnitzer* (LMU): Standing on the shoulders of science
• Examples of current practices
Chair: Kaye Husband-Feeling
- De Ratenfosse G. (EPFL)* & E. Raiteri, The prevalence of NIH-funded research in commercial products
- Discussants: Anna Calcagno (NIGMS, NIH) and Danielle Li (MIT)
A short presentation of all other proposals selected :
(Adam Jaffe (MIT and Brandeis); Bev Holmes, the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
Charles Ayoubi, Fabiana Visentin and Michelle Pezzoni; Sandra Barbosu, the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation;
Chiara Franzonie (Politechnico de Milano) and Henry Sauermann; Experiment.com;
Valentina Tartari (Copenhagen Business School); Henrik Fosse and Rikke Christensen (TBC) Novo Nordisk Foundation;
- Discussants: Anna Calcagno (NIGMS, NIH) and Danielle Li (MIT)
Dinner: 7:00 Bambara Restaurant
Across the street from the Royal Sonesta Hotel
Day Two: Friday July 19th
8:30 am Coffee and Pastries
9:00- 10:30 SESSION V: ORGANIZING SCIENCE FUNDINGChair: Megan MacGarvie
- Wilhelm, M. (LMU) Truly Legendary Freedom: Funding, Incentives and the Productivity of Scientists;
- Ottaviani, M. (Bocconi), Proportional Budget Allocation across Fields, Paylines, and Benchmarking: When Relative Demand Creates Its Own Supply
- Discussant: Tim Simcoe (BU), R. Veugelers (Former ERC Scientific Council); ERC: TBC
- Ottaviani, M. (Bocconi), Proportional Budget Allocation across Fields, Paylines, and Benchmarking: When Relative Demand Creates Its Own Supply
10:45-12:00 SESSION VI: SPECIAL TOPIC: GENDER BIASES IN SCIENCE FUNDING EVALUATION
Chair: Henry Sauermann
- Julian Kolev, Yuly Fuentes-Medel, and Fiona Murray (MIT), How Gendered Outcomes Arise Even Under Anonymous Evaluation: Is Blinded Review Enough?
- Discussant: Donna Ginther (University of Kansas); Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Zach Charat, Gates Foundation, TBC)
12:00-12:30 SESSION VII: MOVING THE SSF AGENDA FORWARD
- Chair: Reinhilde/Paula
- Views from funders; views from academics
- Views from funders; views from academics
- Discussant: Donna Ginther (University of Kansas); Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Zach Charat, Gates Foundation, TBC)